|
|
***********************************************************************
The Forensic Strategy Data Recovery Newsletter Vol. 1, Issue 2
***********************************************************************
-------- IN THIS ISSUE: -----------------------------------------------
COMMENTARY
- COMPUTER FORENSICS 101: What evidence can be RECOVERED?
UPCOMING NEWSLETTER ISSUES
- Items you can look forward to in future issues!
CONTACT US
- For more information on Forensic Strategy Services.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* COMPUTER FORENSICS 101: What evidence can be RECOVERED?
By: Scott Moulton, Computer Forensic Specialist
mailto:scott@forensicstrategy.com
"What evidence can possibly be recovered that can help my client's case?"
Like other types of investigations, the answer will not be fully determined
until after the data has been recovered and the findings are meticulously
researched. The process involved to investigate a computer can be exceptionally
time intensive. An average of seven hours is required before a basic assessment
can be created. The assessment will help establish if the computer contains
valuable information that would justify additional resources. Because it is
initially uncertain what evidence a computer contains, it is essential to
qualify a particular computer before investing additional resources.
"When is there a good possibility to recover useful data so that it is cost
effective to involve a Computer Forensic Investigator?"
* Qualifying a Computer for Forensic Recovery:
In practically every computer there is "deleted" data that can be recovered;
however, the data recovered is not always relevant to the case. Typically, it is
a judgment call which computers should be investigated when there is more than
one computer involved. It helps to establish an order of priority for the
computers to be recovered. Using this method, vital data would be revealed first
which would eliminate wasting resources on less credible computers. It is
possible to predict and prioritize the best computers for recovery based on a
series of questions.
Q: Did any person involved use the computer? Note that this could include
receiving email or files from the party involved.
When a file or email is deleted it is not immediately removed from the hard
drive. It still exists even though it can not be easily accessed. There is a
section of the hard drive that is similar to a "Table of Contents" and when a
file is deleted it is just removed from this "Table of Contents". The originally
deleted file or email is left as dead space on the hard drive. Since the file
exists on the hard drive, special tools that bypass the "Table of Contents" can
search for files and potentially recover them. A file can be divided in to
several pieces and exist in various locations on a hard drive. Because of this,
it is possible that only part of a file might be recovered. A vital component to
a case might exist in one of those small pieces.
If the item that was deleted was an email, a different set of rules apply. An
email, by its nature, exists in more than one place. There is always a From:(the
sender) a To:(the recipient) and at least one server (the machines that
processed the email). If there was CC:(carbon copy) or BCC:(blind carbon copy)
addresses then more copies exist. An email has a greater potential to be
recovered because an email is stored in a file similar to a database.
Consequently, when an email is deleted it is removed from the "Table of
Contents" of the database and not the hard drive itself. It is possible for the
email to persist in a file or server for quite a long time after the email is
"deleted" by a user. This includes Outlook Express, Outlook 2002, AOL, Exchange
Server and several other types of email programs.
If email is read via a web browser (i.e. Hotmail) a copy of the email will
usually exist in the Internet cache or temporary files on the hard drive of the
computer it was viewed from. There is an even greater probability that this
might be recovered.
Q: How long has it been since files were deleted?
Because of the way files are left behind as dead space on the hard drive, as
space is needed by different programs or web pages, the file pieces are
gradually overwritten. The longer time that has transpired since the files were
deleted the less probability that something can be recovered. Although in some
past instances data has been recovered dating back several years.
Q: How much has the computer been used since files were deleted?
Because files are overwritten gradually, the more the computer is used the more
likely new files have overwritten older files erasing your valuable information.
A computer writes files every time that a program is used (including internet
accesses). The Windows Operating System will overwrite certain files every time
the system is powered on. These standard files are not very large but they
account for a significant percentage of the destruction that occurs to
recoverable files. This is an excellent reason to stop using a computer as soon
as it is learned that it is involved in a case until a Computer Forensic
Specialist can examine it. If this computer is necessary for operations of the
business the specialist can safely and effectively "clone" the hard drive to
preserve the information.
If there is someone who can answer these questions there is a good chance of
determining the usefulness of the computer in a case. This is not intended to be
a final list of questions but is a common set to help determine the possibility
that something useful might exist. In some cases the client might not be able to
answer any of these questions and it is also often that the answers given are
incorrect.
Even when there is no one to answer those questions, there is still a good
possibility of recovering valuable evidence from the right computer, even when
the files never existed on the computer.
Example #1:
To the surprise of the CEO of one company, five of its members of a branch
office left overnight to start their own company. No notice was given and it
wasn't until someone arrived at the office after no one answered the phone for
hours that it was discovered they had departed to start a new company.
Initially, there was no major concern except that the employees were gone. The
CEO stated that nothing was taken but they wanted to review the hard drives for
company security purposes. During a data recovery several printer spooler files
were recovered. Since it is sometime a pattern of employees to bring floppy
disks and print documents that never existed on the server, a spooler file can
be very revealing. In this case, the spooler indicated that it had printed to
several high-end HP Color Laser Printers. During the recovery it was noted that
the office had no HP Color Laser Printers. This was brought to the attention of
the CEO and he claimed that it was not possible for the employees to purchase an
asset that large as they have to have approval for purchases over $500. After
investigating, it was determined that the employees had used company funds to
purchase equipment by each individual pooling their purchase below $500 into one
large purchase together.
Often a case will involve someone that believes they are a "computer guru." They
consciously attempt to delete incriminating evidence believing they knew what
they were doing. Their egos make them believe that they know how to delete a
file and that it is permanently unrecoverable and that they are safe. Many times
they are mistaken.
Example #2:
In a divorce case, the husband was accused of having an affair. He was also
chatting and emailing his girlfriend over the Internet. He also spent several
hours a week on illicit adult web sites. The wife described her husband as a
very computer savvy person. She stated several times that he knew everything
about a computer and that he always deleted everything. Because of this
statement there was a great discussion about wasting time with a court order for
the computer. After the computer was investigated, many incriminating items were
recovered. There were chat logs, emails found in the Internet cache files, and
dozens of revealing photos of the girlfriend. When questioned during depositions
he was shocked at the printed material and declared that he had used a special
program in his attempt to overwrite all the deleted files.
Share this email by forwarding to your colleagues!
If this was forwarded to you by a colleague and you'd like to
receive your own edition as soon as it is published, subscribe
by clicking here: http://www.forensicstrategy.com/contactform.aspx
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
==== UPCOMING NEWSLETTER ISSUES ====
* Equipment used for forensic recovery of data
* Details of Forensic Data Gathering
* Profiling a person based on the content of their computer
==== CONTACT US ====
* COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER:
To suggest a topic for a future issue or to send a comment to
the editor email: mailto:comments@forensicstrategy.com
* WEBSITE: http://www.forensicstrategy.com
* MAILING ADDRESS/PHONE/FAX:
Forensic Strategy Services, LLC.
601B Industrial Court
Woodstock, Georgia 30189
ph: 770.926.5588
fax: 770.926.7089
* FOR PERMISSION TO REPRINT PLEASE CONTACT
mailto:scott@forensicstrategy.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a quick UNSUBSCRIBE Click Here:
mailto:fss@forensicstrategy.com?subject=unsubscribe
or - Send an e-mail to: fss@forensicstrategy.com
with "unsubscribe" (no quotes) in the subject line.
Thank you for reading Forensic Strategy Data Recovery Newsletter.
__________________________________________________________
Forensic Strategy Services, LLC. Copyright 2003-2006
If you would like to suggest a topic you like to see in a
future issue please email your suggestion to:
comments@forensicstrategy.com
Forensic Strategy Services,
LLC.
601B Industrial Court
Woodstock, Georgia 30189
ph 770.926.5588
fax 770.926.7089
email:
Scott@ForensicStrategy.com
|
|